CVE-2026-111585
The vulnerability is not remotely exploitable without user interaction; it requires an actively established remote-control session to a malicious or compromised host.
CTI status
As of:
Last pipeline run:
Source reliability
Information credibility
NATO Admiralty (AJP-2.1) grades confidence, independent of the risk score. Cross-source corroboration isn't tracked for non-CVE news, so single-source items are capped at a lower credibility number; a low number does not imply low quality.
The vulnerability is not remotely exploitable without user interaction; it requires an actively established remote-control session to a malicious or compromised host.
The report adds to the pure patch information the specific attack vector via crafted screen-image data or .tvs session recordings; active exploitation is not confirmed.
The NVD entry only documents the vulnerability; there are no indications of active exploitation, an exploit, or an attacker.
The report adds no information beyond the patch details; no active exploitation or additional attack details are documented.
An app with no permissions at all can pose as a trusted Microsoft application such as Teams and harvest sign-in tokens for work accounts , stealing valid tokens this way bypasses multi-factor authentication entirely.
More than a patch note: an already locally logged-on low-privileged attacker can impersonate the IPC broker and thus obtain SYSTEM rights on the endpoint without further exploitation.
Because TeamViewer is in productive use at the company, a flaw in the IPC channel between the client and the monitoring component becomes a direct path from a standard user account to SYSTEM rights , a classic pivot after an attacker gains a first foothold on an endpoint.
The report adds attack-vector detail beyond the patch information: a locally authenticated user can load a signed executable via a forged IPC response and thereby gain SYSTEM privileges.
Beyond the patch information, the alert shows that the installation of TeamViewer Advanced Asset Management itself introduces a local privilege-escalation risk, not only the running client.
The alert details a local privilege escalation in TeamViewer Patch Management that requires valid local credentials and is not reported as actively exploited.
Beyond the patch information, the advisory provides no indication of active exploitation or a public exploit; the risk lies primarily in document-based delivery via email or the web.
The vulnerability requires user interaction via a crafted PDF or web page, making it suitable for targeted phishing attacks against end users.
Exploitation requires user interaction, so crafted PDFs serve as the entry vector; the advisory provides no evidence of active exploitation.
The vulnerability requires user interaction and is therefore classically suited for phishing campaigns using manipulated PDF documents against end users.
The ZDI advisory documents a single vulnerability with no indication of active exploitation or KEV listing; exploitation strictly requires a user to interact with a crafted document or web page.
Beyond patch information, the advisory provides no evidence of active exploitation; the vulnerability requires user interaction and is rated high with CVSS 7.8.
The advisory documents a specific, highly rated Reader vulnerability requiring user interaction, with no indication of active exploitation or KEV status.
Because exploitation requires opening a crafted PDF or visiting a malicious page, real-world risk depends less on patch timing than on the effectiveness of mail filtering and user awareness.
The advisory adds little beyond patch information: it describes a local LPE in Linux kernel IPv6 multicast routing with CVSS 8.8, and does not mention active exploitation or a PoC.
The alert shows that the AD connection of FortiGate firewalls itself can become an attack vector if an attacker controls the AD response traffic , that is more than a pure patch issue.
Beyond the patch information, the alert shows that an authenticated attacker with access to the Firebox management interface can potentially execute code, not just crash the certificate service.
The key point is that exploitation requires an existing Restore Operator role and controllable NAS backup contents, making it primarily relevant for compromised accounts or insiders.
The report highlights a recurring attack path via external Teams chats that combines IT-support impersonation and email bombing to enable remote access and follow-on activity.
The report confirms a DoS vulnerability in FortiOS but, without a CVE ID, version details, and exploit status, does not allow a reliable prioritization.